HopsigTechnologies
Services▾
01Custom softwareProducts built end to end02Team augmentationEngineers inside your team03Data engineering & analyticsPipelines and reporting people stop arguing with04AI & machine learningFeatures that have to be right, not impressive05Cloud & DevOpsDeploys that are boring06Legacy modernisationRebuilds the in-house team can run07MobileiOS and Android without two teams08QA & test automationSuites that make deploys boring
All eight, and the three ways we work →
Industries▾
01Fintech & payments150+ · merchants, four months after launch02Retail & e-commerce5× · repeat transactions, enterprise loyalty03Healthcare & life sciences60% · less analysis time on preclinical data04Logistics, travel & marketplacesReal-time · load status and assignments over WebSockets05IoT, signage & the built environment200+ · buildings on one telemetry platform06SaaS, platforms & AI products10 · engineers on the agentic delivery path
All six →
AI transformationAgentic flow
01Work32 case notes, client names withheld02ApproachHow we staff, run and measure an account03NotesThings we would say on the call anyway04Working with usContracts, IP, data, security, invoicing05For agenciesWhite-label delivery under your brand06JoinSenior-led, and what that means07Why not just hire?The honest table
Book a consult
HopsigTechnologies
We scope, build and run software and AI products end to end, or put engineers inside the team you already have.
Book a consult
Services
Custom softwareTeam augmentationData engineering & analyticsAI & machine learningCloud & DevOpsLegacy modernisationMobileQA & test automation
Industries
Fintech & paymentsRetail & e-commerceHealthcare & life sciencesLogistics, travel & marketplacesIoT, signage & the built environmentSaaS, platforms & AI products
Company
ApproachWorkNotesAI transformationAgentic flowFor agenciesJoinWorking with us
Start
Book a consultSend a briefWhy not just hire?PrivacyTerms
Hopsig Technologies LLC · Sheridan, Wyoming, USA · Delivery Centre: Lahore, Pakistan© 2026 · hopsig.com · info@hopsig.com ·

QA & test automation servicesSuites that make
deploys boring.

Unit, integration and end-to-end coverage that runs in CI in minutes, plus load testing before the launch rather than after the outage.

Book a consultSee our work
Runs in minutes
Or it is not run.
Flake tracked
And fixed, not retried.
Load tested
Before launch day.
Engagement
Embedded · monthly, per engineer

What you get.

Unit, integration and end-to-end coverage that runs in CI in minutes
Flaky tests tracked and fixed, not retried until green
Load testing before the launch, not after the outage
The same discipline for AI features: an evaluation harness that gates release
Engagement: Embedded · monthly, per engineer · Ask about your test suite →
Good for
— Releases that break something every time
— A test suite everyone skips
— A launch with no idea what load it takes
We will say no when
— Coverage is wanted as a number rather than as fewer incidents
— Tests are wanted so that nobody has to review
Stack · only what we have shipped to production
Automated test generationEval harnessesGuardrailsPlaywrightpytestJestk6CI pipelines
Where we do this mostFintech & payments →Healthcare & life sciences →

From the record.

All case notes →
01 · AI · delivery
Data & AI

Agentic software-delivery framework on Claude Code

Problem — An engineering practice wanted to deliver faster without losing review, tests and documentation along the way.
What we did — An end-to-end pipeline on Claude Code: project planning, automated epic and story population with progress tracking, autonomous story implementation, a dedicated solutions-architect agent, guardrail enforcement, automated code review and test generation, living documentation, and human-in-the-loop escalation pushed to mobile when a decision needs a person.
Measured — Rolled out to 10 engineers and now the practice’s default path for new work. Two Android apps scoped at five developers were shipped by one, on the original timeline.
Claude CodeMCP serversAgent orchestrationGuardrailsAutomated reviewJira
Client withheld · details on the callAsk about this →
02 · Agritech · computer vision
Data & AI

Detection from user-submitted photographs

Problem — Non-experts photographing in poor conditions; a model that had to act on what they sent.
What we did — Owned the labelled dataset strategy, the evaluation criteria that gated release, production monitoring and the retraining loop as field data arrived; capture guidance and failure handling treated as part of the product. Localised for low-literacy users.
Measured — 98% detection accuracy. Government incubator funding secured on the minimum viable build.
Computer visionDataset strategyEvaluationRetraining loopi18n
Client withheld · details on the callAsk about this →
03 · Retail · AI
Data & AI

Personalisation and image-search engine

Problem — Recommendations and visual search that had to prove their return in the client’s numbers, not in a demo.
What we did — Recommendation and image-search models with evaluation before release, production monitoring, retraining and version rollout owned end to end.
Measured — Up to 261× client ROI. Shipped an image-search model into production.
Recommendation systemsImage searchEvaluation gatesModel monitoring
Client withheld · details on the callAsk about this →
QA & test automation · the call

Show us the suite everyone skips. We will make it trusted.

Bring the problem, not a brief. If it is outside what we do well, we will say which of our contacts to call instead.

Book a consultSee our work
Or email info@hopsig.com — reply within one working day.
LAST 30 RUNScheckout.speccart.specauth.specsearch.specrefund.specprofile.specinvoice.specexport.specwebhook.specadmin.specbilling.specupload.speci18n.specroles.specsso.specnotify.specreport.specapi.specrate-limit.spechealth.specfixed › notify.spec: no shared fixturesSUITE TIME IN CIEXAMPLE FIGURES6mFLAKE RATE0.2%K6 · LOAD TESTSLO 300 MSP95 238 MS @ 5,000 VUSUNITINTEGRATIONE2ELOADMerge pull request
Flaky tests fixed at the cause. A suite that runs in minutes. Load tested before launch day. Example figures.

How it runs.

The same loop as every engagement
Week 0

Read the suite

What exists, what is skipped, what is flaky, and how long a green build takes today.
Week 1

A gate on every pull request

The suite runs in CI in minutes; a red build blocks the merge, and everyone can see why.
Week 3

End to end on the journeys that matter

The five flows that would make the phone ring, covered on real browsers and devices.
Week 6

Load test and handover

The launch load, run before the launch; your team owns the suite and the flake board.
Fortnightly

The review

Build time, flake rate, incidents, before and after. Then the next gap.
DELIVERED ON OUR AGENTIC PIPELINESix agents. A person at every gate.See the pipeline →PLANSTORIESBUILDREVIEWDOCSESCALATE

Questions we get about this.

Playwright, pytest, Jest and k6 for most stacks, plus generated tests and guardrails from our agentic pipeline where the codebase suits it. The tool follows the stack; we do not make you adopt ours.

A suite that runs in minutes speeds the team up; one that takes an hour gets skipped. The first thing we measure is build time, and it goes down before coverage goes up.

Yes. Evaluation harnesses are tests: a labelled set, a number, a gate in CI. We have shipped them for computer vision, recommendation and retrieval features.

The other seven.

All eight end in something running
01Custom software→02Team augmentation→03Data engineering & analytics→04AI & machine learning→05Cloud & DevOps→06Legacy modernisation→07Mobile→08QA & test automationhere